Re: [License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)

[Bruce Perens]

Would that we all had infinite budgets for going to court :-) But short 
of having them, many businesses choose, quite sensibly, to err on the 
conservative side of this sort of issue and will honor the license 
whether or not a court would make them do so. This will also get them 
through an M&A intellectual property audit in better shape than otherwise.

I do know a company that spent money, including on me, to argue just 
this sort of issue recently. They spent more than most businesses would 
be able to endure.

    Thanks

    Bruce

On 01/01/2013 05:23 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
Really? That's not wise. How would the choice of license affect the 
*legal* determination of whether the resulting work is or is not a 
derivative work for which source code must be disclosed?

<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss