Re: [License-discuss] License which requires watermarking? (Attribution Provision)

Tue, 01 Jan 2013 18:58:51 -0800

Would that we all had infinite budgets for going to court :-) But short of having them, many businesses choose, quite sensibly, to err on the conservative side of this sort of issue and will honor the license whether or not a court would make them do so. This will also get them through an M&A intellectual property audit in better shape than otherwise.
I do know a company that spent money, including on me, to argue just this sort of issue recently. They spent more than most businesses would be able to endure. 

    Thanks

    Bruce

On 01/01/2013 05:23 PM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:

Really? That's not wise. How would the choice of license affect the 
*legal* determination of whether the resulting work is or is not a 
derivative work for which source code must be disclosed?



<<attachment: bruce.vcf>>
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss























					Reply via email to