On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:31:06 -0700 Ben Tilly <bti...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Suggested solution, can we use the word "common" instead of > "standard"? And our definition of common should be something > relatively objective, like the top X licenses in use on github, minus > licenses (like the GPL v2) whose authors are pushing to replace with a > different license. You'd exclude the most commonly-used FLOSS license from "common"? - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
