Apparently so. Because if you agree with the goals of the GPL, you should probably be using GPL v3+ rather than GPL v2+.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Richard Fontana <font...@sharpeleven.org> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:31:06 -0700 > Ben Tilly <bti...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Suggested solution, can we use the word "common" instead of >> "standard"? And our definition of common should be something >> relatively objective, like the top X licenses in use on github, minus >> licenses (like the GPL v2) whose authors are pushing to replace with a >> different license. > > You'd exclude the most commonly-used FLOSS license from "common"? > > - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
