touché Maybe than “licenses that people think they understand" From: Lawrence Rosen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:33:10 -0700 To: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"?
Philip Odence suggested: > Hey maybe “well-understood” is a good alternative to “standard." Note that the GPL is one of the "least-understood" licenses around, even by some of its supporters who make the most outrageous claims about linking. :-) /Larry From: Philip Odence [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 4:52 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? <snip> _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
