Hi Nuno,
I found similar things discussed on the list, so I thought it might be
worth asking, sorry if that was a misunderstanding.
Unfortunately, I have to disappoint you, I don't know which company you
are talking about. This is a question related to an open source project.
I know Himmelkron though, in case you ever come there, visit the former
monastery. The cloister is nice, if you examine the angels playing music
on the high points of the arches closely, you will notice that some of
the play the bagpipe - providing proof that this instrument now
considered so Scottish was once popular all over Europe.
Cheers,
Stefan
On 05/03/2015 09:51 PM, Nuno Brito wrote:
Hi Stefan,
I think the reason why you're not getting replies is because that
mailing list is mostly intended to propose new license terms before they
are accepted by the OSI.
From that perspective, you likely won't get many replies because the
case is generic.
Being generic, I looked for more information and imagine that you're the
person behind a certain company in Himmelkron.
For that kind of information you usually need to consult a lawyer and/or
consult an expert on this field.
With kind regards,
Nuno Brito
03.05.2015, 22:21, "Stefan Kuhn" <stef...@web.de>:
Apologies for the html mail, here is plain text.
Hi all,
apologies if this is not the right list to ask. I have a situation where
I am not sure if there is an open source licence which does what I want.
I have a database which serves as the base for algorithms infer
conclusions from it. Some of these algorithms are well known, but there
is still innovation in the area. Without the data though it is pointless
or impossible to write algorithms. Larger collections of such data are
not common and cannot easily be built. I would like to publish my
database under an open source licence and I would want to things to be
enforced: a) derived versions of the database (extended, error corrected
etc.) must be under the same licence again (this could be done by using
the Open Data Commons Open Database License, I think) and b) software
incorporating the database must be under an open source licence as well.
The second bit is the tricky one, I think. Is there a solution to this
or is the whole idea rubbish? I want to make sure that people do not
just take my database, put a well known algorithm round it and sell it.
I think this is a reasonable idea, but I am unsure if it could be
enforced via a licence.
Do you have any ideas about this? Please tell me if you believe my
thinking is flawed.
Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org <mailto:License-discuss@opensource.org>
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
--
http://triplecheck.net
phone: +49 615 146 03187
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
