On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Tim Perrett <he...@timperrett.com> wrote:
>
> What's the impact overall?
The impact is: use innerHTML directly rather than going through jQuery's
HTML re-writing.
> Is this a result of upgrade to JQuery
> 1.3.1?
No. This is a latent Firefox bug and has to do with how jQuery sanitizes
HTML. The problem existed in prior versions of jQuery, but is now an issue
because of the lift:gc stuff.
>
>
> Thanks, Tim
>
> On Feb 16, 4:51 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Folks,
> > It turns out that there are issues with jQuery's methods that
> insert/replace
> > HTML and using XHTML on Firefox. Sigh.
> >
> > We should be aware of this. using $("...").html(stuff) will likely fail
> if
> > any of the elements in stuff have namespaces.
> >
> > Sorry.
> >
> > David
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: John Resig <jere...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:31 PM
> > Subject: [jquery-dev] Re: Namespace failure
> > To: jquery-...@googlegroups.com
> >
> > Anko -
> >
> > You're welcome to file a bug on XHTML support - let me know when you
> > do. I have it penciled in the Roadmap for jQuery 1.4 - but it's going
> > to require a lot of work (basic things like innerHTML aren't
> > guaranteed to work, for example) - not to mention that things like
> > attributes and expandos are handled very differently.
> >
> > I took some very basic steps of converting our test suite to run under
> > the proper mimetype and wasn't terribly pleased with the result (lots
> > of failures). I'll definitely revisit it at some point, though. Right
> > now the only component guaranteed I'm sure that passes is the selector
> > engine. I'd like to have 100% passing in all components for 1.4.
> >
> > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/xhtml.php
> >
> > --John
> >
> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Anko Painting <anko....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a ticket associated with this bug? I'm dealing with the same
> > > issue myself.
> >
> > > It's frustrating because i need to serve as application/xhtml+xml so
> > > that I can put svg on the page.
> >
> > > On Feb 14, 12:52 am, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces it in to
> > >> the XML mode where everything becomes 'fun'.
> >
> > >> --John
> >
> > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, David Zhou <da...@nodnod.net> wrote:
> >
> > >> >http://media.nodnod.net/test.htmlworksfor me. Is it because I'm not
> > >> > serving the page as application/xhtml+xml?
> >
> > >> > -- dz
> >
> > >> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Dave Methvin <
> dave.meth...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >> >> Me too.
> >
> > >> >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/
> > >> >> 2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> >
> > --
> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp
> >
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
