Seems to work just fine in IE6 32 and 64bit as well as Google Chrome On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jorge Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Made two files. > > One has 100 random (legit) CSS classes with a random font size and a random > color. It also has 1000 <div> elements, each picks one random (legit) class > from those mentioned above, and also adds a unique lift-gc-[uuid] class. > > The other is the same with but without the unique lift-gc-[uuid] classes. > > Works fine on FF3 and Safari3. Don't have IE handy to test. > > --j > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:24 PM, David Pollak < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I wonder if 1,000 missing classes will cause the CSS engines to barf. >> Anyone want to mock up a page or two and feed them into IE6, etc.? >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Jorge Ortiz <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> This might be a bit of a pain to deal with, but something like: >>> >>> <tag class="lift-gc lift-gc-[uuid]" /> >>> >>> Of course, you'd want to append to the 'class' attribute, not replace it >>> entirely. >>> >>> --j >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:49 PM, David Pollak < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> what would the raw XHTML look like? >>>> Also, we can't rely on jQuery to scrape because we have to support other >>>> libraries (e.g., YUI) without jQuery. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Viktor Klang >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> How about adding a class-attribute called "gc" to everything that's >>>>> supposedly collectible? >>>>> Then doing a scrape using jQuery(".gc") would be just as feasible. >>>>> >>>>> Would it solve the problem or can it be extended to solve it fully? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 PM, David Pollak < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jorge Ortiz >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Can lift:gc be renamed lift_gc until the bug is addressed? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> lift_gc is not a valid attribute in XHTML as far as I know, so >>>>>> browsers would reject any element containing that attribute. :-( >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, David Pollak < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Tim Perrett >>>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What's the impact overall? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The impact is: use innerHTML directly rather than going through >>>>>>>> jQuery's HTML re-writing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this a result of upgrade to JQuery >>>>>>>>> 1.3.1? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> No. This is a latent Firefox bug and has to do with how jQuery >>>>>>>> sanitizes HTML. The problem existed in prior versions of jQuery, but >>>>>>>> is now >>>>>>>> an issue because of the lift:gc stuff. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, Tim >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Feb 16, 4:51 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > Folks, >>>>>>>>> > It turns out that there are issues with jQuery's methods that >>>>>>>>> insert/replace >>>>>>>>> > HTML and using XHTML on Firefox. Sigh. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > We should be aware of this. using $("...").html(stuff) will >>>>>>>>> likely fail if >>>>>>>>> > any of the elements in stuff have namespaces. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Sorry. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > David >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>> > From: John Resig <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:31 PM >>>>>>>>> > Subject: [jquery-dev] Re: Namespace failure >>>>>>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > Anko - >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > You're welcome to file a bug on XHTML support - let me know when >>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>> > do. I have it penciled in the Roadmap for jQuery 1.4 - but it's >>>>>>>>> going >>>>>>>>> > to require a lot of work (basic things like innerHTML aren't >>>>>>>>> > guaranteed to work, for example) - not to mention that things >>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>> > attributes and expandos are handled very differently. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > I took some very basic steps of converting our test suite to run >>>>>>>>> under >>>>>>>>> > the proper mimetype and wasn't terribly pleased with the result >>>>>>>>> (lots >>>>>>>>> > of failures). I'll definitely revisit it at some point, though. >>>>>>>>> Right >>>>>>>>> > now the only component guaranteed I'm sure that passes is the >>>>>>>>> selector >>>>>>>>> > engine. I'd like to have 100% passing in all components for 1.4. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/xhtml.php >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > --John >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Anko Painting < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > > Is there a ticket associated with this bug? I'm dealing with >>>>>>>>> the same >>>>>>>>> > > issue myself. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > > It's frustrating because i need to serve as >>>>>>>>> application/xhtml+xml so >>>>>>>>> > > that I can put svg on the page. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > > On Feb 14, 12:52 am, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >> Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces >>>>>>>>> it in to >>>>>>>>> > >> the XML mode where everything becomes 'fun'. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> --John >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, David Zhou <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >http://media.nodnod.net/test.htmlworksfor me. Is it because >>>>>>>>> I'm not >>>>>>>>> > >> > serving the page as application/xhtml+xml? >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > -- dz >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Dave Methvin < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> Me too. >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >> >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) >>>>>>>>> Gecko/ >>>>>>>>> > >> >> 2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > -- >>>>>>>>> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >>>>>>>>> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>>>>> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>>>>> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Viktor Klang >>>>> Senior Systems Analyst >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >> >> >> > > > > -- Viktor Klang Senior Systems Analyst --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
