what would the raw XHTML look like?
Also, we can't rely on jQuery to scrape because we have to support other
libraries (e.g., YUI) without jQuery.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Viktor Klang <viktor.kl...@gmail.com>wrote:
> How about adding a class-attribute called "gc" to everything that's
> supposedly collectible?
> Then doing a scrape using jQuery(".gc") would be just as feasible.
>
> Would it solve the problem or can it be extended to solve it fully?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 PM, David Pollak <
> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jorge Ortiz <jorge.or...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Can lift:gc be renamed lift_gc until the bug is addressed?
>>
>>
>> lift_gc is not a valid attribute in XHTML as far as I know, so browsers
>> would reject any element containing that attribute. :-(
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, David Pollak <
>>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Tim Perrett <he...@timperrett.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the impact overall?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The impact is: use innerHTML directly rather than going through jQuery's
>>>> HTML re-writing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Is this a result of upgrade to JQuery
>>>>> 1.3.1?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No. This is a latent Firefox bug and has to do with how jQuery
>>>> sanitizes HTML. The problem existed in prior versions of jQuery, but is
>>>> now
>>>> an issue because of the lift:gc stuff.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 16, 4:51 pm, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > Folks,
>>>>> > It turns out that there are issues with jQuery's methods that
>>>>> insert/replace
>>>>> > HTML and using XHTML on Firefox. Sigh.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We should be aware of this. using $("...").html(stuff) will likely
>>>>> fail if
>>>>> > any of the elements in stuff have namespaces.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Sorry.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > David
>>>>> >
>>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> > From: John Resig <jere...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > Date: Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:31 PM
>>>>> > Subject: [jquery-dev] Re: Namespace failure
>>>>> > To: jquery-...@googlegroups.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Anko -
>>>>> >
>>>>> > You're welcome to file a bug on XHTML support - let me know when you
>>>>> > do. I have it penciled in the Roadmap for jQuery 1.4 - but it's going
>>>>> > to require a lot of work (basic things like innerHTML aren't
>>>>> > guaranteed to work, for example) - not to mention that things like
>>>>> > attributes and expandos are handled very differently.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I took some very basic steps of converting our test suite to run
>>>>> under
>>>>> > the proper mimetype and wasn't terribly pleased with the result (lots
>>>>> > of failures). I'll definitely revisit it at some point, though. Right
>>>>> > now the only component guaranteed I'm sure that passes is the
>>>>> selector
>>>>> > engine. I'd like to have 100% passing in all components for 1.4.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/xhtml.php
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --John
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Anko Painting <anko....@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > Is there a ticket associated with this bug? I'm dealing with the
>>>>> same
>>>>> > > issue myself.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > It's frustrating because i need to serve as application/xhtml+xml
>>>>> so
>>>>> > > that I can put svg on the page.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > On Feb 14, 12:52 am, John Resig <jere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > >> Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces it in
>>>>> to
>>>>> > >> the XML mode where everything becomes 'fun'.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> --John
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, David Zhou <da...@nodnod.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> >http://media.nodnod.net/test.htmlworksfor me. Is it because I'm
>>>>> not
>>>>> > >> > serving the page as application/xhtml+xml?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> > -- dz
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Dave Methvin <
>>>>> dave.meth...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> >> Me too.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > >> >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6)
>>>>> Gecko/
>>>>> > >> >> 2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
>>>>> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>>>>> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
>>>>> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>>>>
>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Viktor Klang
> Senior Systems Analyst
>
>
> >
>
--
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
