This might be a bit of a pain to deal with, but something like: <tag class="lift-gc lift-gc-[uuid]" />
Of course, you'd want to append to the 'class' attribute, not replace it entirely. --j On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:49 PM, David Pollak <[email protected] > wrote: > what would the raw XHTML look like? > Also, we can't rely on jQuery to scrape because we have to support other > libraries (e.g., YUI) without jQuery. > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Viktor Klang <[email protected]>wrote: > >> How about adding a class-attribute called "gc" to everything that's >> supposedly collectible? >> Then doing a scrape using jQuery(".gc") would be just as feasible. >> >> Would it solve the problem or can it be extended to solve it fully? >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:37 PM, David Pollak < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jorge Ortiz <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Can lift:gc be renamed lift_gc until the bug is addressed? >>> >>> >>> lift_gc is not a valid attribute in XHTML as far as I know, so browsers >>> would reject any element containing that attribute. :-( >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:20 AM, David Pollak < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Tim Perrett <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> What's the impact overall? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The impact is: use innerHTML directly rather than going through >>>>> jQuery's HTML re-writing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is this a result of upgrade to JQuery >>>>>> 1.3.1? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> No. This is a latent Firefox bug and has to do with how jQuery >>>>> sanitizes HTML. The problem existed in prior versions of jQuery, but is >>>>> now >>>>> an issue because of the lift:gc stuff. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 16, 4:51 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > Folks, >>>>>> > It turns out that there are issues with jQuery's methods that >>>>>> insert/replace >>>>>> > HTML and using XHTML on Firefox. Sigh. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > We should be aware of this. using $("...").html(stuff) will likely >>>>>> fail if >>>>>> > any of the elements in stuff have namespaces. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Sorry. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > David >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>> > From: John Resig <[email protected]> >>>>>> > Date: Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 8:31 PM >>>>>> > Subject: [jquery-dev] Re: Namespace failure >>>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Anko - >>>>>> > >>>>>> > You're welcome to file a bug on XHTML support - let me know when you >>>>>> > do. I have it penciled in the Roadmap for jQuery 1.4 - but it's >>>>>> going >>>>>> > to require a lot of work (basic things like innerHTML aren't >>>>>> > guaranteed to work, for example) - not to mention that things like >>>>>> > attributes and expandos are handled very differently. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I took some very basic steps of converting our test suite to run >>>>>> under >>>>>> > the proper mimetype and wasn't terribly pleased with the result >>>>>> (lots >>>>>> > of failures). I'll definitely revisit it at some point, though. >>>>>> Right >>>>>> > now the only component guaranteed I'm sure that passes is the >>>>>> selector >>>>>> > engine. I'd like to have 100% passing in all components for 1.4. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/jquery/test/xhtml.php >>>>>> > >>>>>> > --John >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Anko Painting <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Is there a ticket associated with this bug? I'm dealing with the >>>>>> same >>>>>> > > issue myself. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > It's frustrating because i need to serve as application/xhtml+xml >>>>>> so >>>>>> > > that I can put svg on the page. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > On Feb 14, 12:52 am, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >> Correct - you have to do it with the mimetype - which forces it >>>>>> in to >>>>>> > >> the XML mode where everything becomes 'fun'. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> --John >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, David Zhou <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> >http://media.nodnod.net/test.htmlworksfor me. Is it because >>>>>> I'm not >>>>>> > >> > serving the page as application/xhtml+xml? >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > -- dz >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Dave Methvin < >>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> >> Me too. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.6) >>>>>> Gecko/ >>>>>> > >> >> 2009011913 Firefox/3.0.6 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -- >>>>>> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net >>>>>> > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>>> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>>> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>>> >>>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Viktor Klang >> Senior Systems Analyst >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
