On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have just tried mvn -Drun.mode=production jetty:run ... but sadly still > getting same performance. I ran a simple test (the same command line as you) on my 2.67 Ghz Core i7 machine and saw 600 pages per second. Granted, my machine's faster, but not 10x. I'll spend some time putting together a complete benchmark tomorrow so we can share the same executable and hopefully see the same results. > > > Daniel > > > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, David Pollak < > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> Thank you for your reply. >>> >>> How and where can I set production vs development mode in lift ? >> >> >> Set the "run.mode" system property to "production" I do that with >> -Drun.mode=production when I start Jetty, but you may do it differently. >> >> Also, In the basic app, there's an RDBMS request for the User object on >> each page load and if you've got Derby configured, that's going to slow >> things down. >> >> >> >>> >>> Thank you again. >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM, David Pollak < >>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Are you running Lift in production or development mode? >>>> I typically see 300 pages/second to 800 pages/second when I do >>>> benchmarks on dual core opteron machines. >>>> >>>> I'll look into this, but you should be seeing north of 300 pages per >>>> second with simple pages in Lift. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Dunsun <dun...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I'm very new to lift and scala. >>>>> >>>>> I have made some Grails intranet applications but sadly Grails or >>>>> better say GSP rendering part which is completely written in Groovy is >>>>> a very slow beast (even in comparison with Rails or Django). >>>>> >>>>> For my future big project (heavy loaded site) I need something much >>>>> faster. >>>>> >>>>> So I have made some quick and dirty Lift benchmarks using ApacheBench >>>>> + Tomcat, GlassFish (from netbeans) and even Jetty. >>>>> My machine - AMD X2 @ 2500Mhz, 4 GB RAM >>>>> >>>>> LIFT BASIC SAMPLE: >>>>> ab -c 10 -n 3000 >>>>> http://localhost:8080/liftbasic-1.0-SNAPSHOT/user_mgt/login >>>>> 50 req/s >>>>> >>>>> LIFT BLANK SAMPLE: >>>>> ab -c 10 -n 3000 http://localhost:8080/liftblank-1.0/ >>>>> 120 req/s >>>>> >>>>> Obtained numbers were similar for all 3 servers. >>>>> >>>>> Using Stripes and rendering similar simple pages I'm getting much much >>>>> higher scores (600 req/s). >>>>> Using Grails I'm getting little worse results but I would say it is >>>>> same league. >>>>> I would expect much better performance from Lift which is written in >>>>> scala. >>>>> >>>>> Why am I getting these low numbers ? >>>>> Am I doing something wrong ? >>>>> Any suggestion is very welcome. >>>>> >>>>> regards >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >>>> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >>>> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >>>> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >> >> >> > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
