Dave if you're doing benchmarks can you try using the template caching
mechanism ? .. and try to see the differences ?

Br's,
Marius

On May 4, 6:23 am, David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have just tried mvn -Drun.mode=production jetty:run  ... but sadly still
> > getting same performance.
>
> I ran a simple test (the same command line as you) on my 2.67 Ghz Core i7
> machine and saw 600 pages per second.  Granted, my machine's faster, but not
> 10x.
>
> I'll spend some time putting together a complete benchmark tomorrow so we
> can share the same executable and hopefully see the same results.
>
>
>
>
>
> > Daniel
>
> > On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, David Pollak <
> > feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Daniel Guryca <dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Hi David,
>
> >>> Thank you for your reply.
>
> >>> How and where can I set production vs development mode in lift ?
>
> >> Set the "run.mode" system property to "production"  I do that with
> >> -Drun.mode=production when I start Jetty, but you may do it differently.
>
> >> Also, In the basic app, there's an RDBMS request for the User object on
> >> each page load and if you've got Derby configured, that's going to slow
> >> things down.
>
> >>> Thank you again.
> >>> Daniel
>
> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 3:12 PM, David Pollak <
> >>> feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Are you running Lift in production or development mode?
> >>>> I typically see 300 pages/second to 800 pages/second when I do
> >>>> benchmarks on dual core opteron machines.
>
> >>>> I'll look into this, but you should be seeing north of 300 pages per
> >>>> second with simple pages in Lift.
>
> >>>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Dunsun <dun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>> I'm very new to lift and scala.
>
> >>>>> I have made some Grails intranet applications but sadly Grails or
> >>>>> better say GSP rendering part which is completely written in Groovy is
> >>>>> a very slow beast (even in comparison with Rails or Django).
>
> >>>>> For my future big project (heavy loaded site) I need something much
> >>>>> faster.
>
> >>>>> So I have made some quick and dirty Lift benchmarks using ApacheBench
> >>>>> + Tomcat, GlassFish (from netbeans) and even Jetty.
> >>>>> My machine - AMD X2 @ 2500Mhz, 4 GB RAM
>
> >>>>> LIFT BASIC SAMPLE:
> >>>>> ab -c 10 -n 3000
> >>>>>http://localhost:8080/liftbasic-1.0-SNAPSHOT/user_mgt/login
> >>>>> 50 req/s
>
> >>>>> LIFT BLANK SAMPLE:
> >>>>> ab -c 10 -n 3000http://localhost:8080/liftblank-1.0/
> >>>>> 120 req/s
>
> >>>>> Obtained numbers were similar for all 3 servers.
>
> >>>>> Using Stripes and rendering similar simple pages I'm getting much much
> >>>>> higher scores (600 req/s).
> >>>>> Using Grails I'm getting little worse results but I would say it is
> >>>>> same league.
> >>>>> I would expect much better performance from Lift which is written in
> >>>>> scala.
>
> >>>>> Why am I getting these low numbers ?
> >>>>> Am I doing something wrong ?
> >>>>> Any suggestion is very welcome.
>
> >>>>> regards
> >>>>> Daniel
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> >>>> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> >>>> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> >>>> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
>
> >> --
> >> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> >> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> >> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> >> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
>
> --
> Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some:http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to