Just to let you know: This policy (and the form it is stated) seems overly strict to me when we are talking about small fixes/typos and instantly discourages me from sending in any more of them (i.e. perhaps I will do it anyway but with a bad feeling).
I know and understand: It is your project and in the first place the committers owe nothing to Us, The Users. I can understand (and do value) the overall decision to let the concensus of committers drive the development instead of the quickest patch sent to the ML. Still, for small contributions this policy looks for me like a lost opportunity to let the broader community polish up little things noone else noticed yet. Actually, I just started using lift and I really liked what I've seen so far. The question is if I'll still actively and openly try to fix things which occur to me (as a beginner) or if I fix things quitely and stay a passive user. Or am I completely mistaken and misunderstood the policy? Johannes --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
