Makes sense :)

On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Marius <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> In my mind the severity says the level of impact for the submitter,
> and priority is the result of comitters' bandwidth. But it's not a big
> issue.
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Oct 27, 11:23 pm, Derek Chen-Becker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > OK, I just pushed the initial revision of my model to GitHub athttp://
> github.com/dchenbecker/LiftTicket. I think that this covers most of
> > the features that Marius discussed in his response. I agree with all of
> it,
> > although I'm not 100% sure about having both a severity and priority
> field
> > on the ticket. This was kind of a code vomit, so I'm going to split the
> > classes out into separate Scala files once I get some feedback and a
> better
> > idea of what needs to be done.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Derek
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:29 AM, Derek Chen-Becker
> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > I'm a fan of Trac, which is one incarnation of Wiki+Tracking+Planning.
> I've
> > > set up a repo here:
> >
> > >http://github.com/dchenbecker/LiftTicket
> >
> > > My preference is for this to be an issue tracking system first and a
> > > Wiki/CMS second, but I'm open to any and all ideas on how this can be
> > > fleshed out. I would also like to plan on doing a couple of iterations
> to
> > > get it all working. I like Marius' list of features but I'd like to
> start
> > > with a subset of those and expand it. My first "milestone" would be
> getting
> > > it to the point where it could self-host its own planning for
> enhancements
> > > and bug tracking, and I think I can do that with a small set of initial
> > > features.
> >
> > > Derek
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > >> How about we integrate the wiki, blog, forum, and issue tracker into
> the
> > >> CMS? ;)
> > >> Seriously, maybe it would be a good idea to create a repo and list,
> and
> > >> start serious discussion on all aspects of its design. Maybe it could
> become
> > >> a big community project, with lots of feedback to Lift.
> >
> > >> -------------------------------------
> > >> jlist9<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> CMS, wiki, blog, forum also sound more interesting than bug tracking
> > >> system to me :-)
> >
> > >> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:13 AM, aw <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> > I don't mean to be negative, but are other options being considered
> > >> > besides a ticketing system?  I kind of wonder if the effort is worth
> > >> > it when excellent alternatives exist (like JIRA -- their Git
> > >> > integration may interest you:
> > >>https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/4984
> > >> > -- I have used their Subversion integration and was very pleased).
> >
> > >> > I would be far more interested in seeing something done for the
> > >> > benefit of the Lift Web Site.  (Is it written with Lift?)  I don't
> see
> > >> > a Lift CMS -- and that is something that could evolve well over
> time.
> > >> > I think it is important for a web framework to use their own stuff,
> > >> > and it should be indicative of the cool things that it can do,
> > >> > stability, scale, and performance...  (I am amazed that I have seen
> > >> > rather poor demonstrations of this, specifically by Adobe and JBoss
> --
> > >> > but again, I'm not trying to be negative...)
> >
> > >> > I see the Lift site integrating Google Analytics...  Is that
> something
> > >> > that could be "out of the box" with Lift?  That could be a selling
> > >> > point to people making external web sites.
> >
> > >> > Another area that would be neat to develop is instrumentation.  Sort
> > >> > of the JMX-Console equivalent for Lift.  For scalability and sizing
> > >> > analysis, this would be really useful.
> >
> > >> > Having said that, one major feature that I feel is missing from
> github
> > >> > is the lack of attachments for an issue.  How do you attach test
> cases
> > >> > or patches for an issue?
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to