Erkki, We use this same list for developer discussions as well. So, yes, this is where you are free to provide suggestion.
Cheers, Indrajit On 29/12/09 11:56 PM, Erkki Lindpere wrote: > Hmm... actually seems like it will be a long document, I've already > got several suggestions with 10 minutes of looking. Maybe I'll do a > complete code review for the lift-webkit module if I have time / feel > like it. Where should I post it? There doesn't seem to be a separate > developers list. > > Erkki L > > On Dec 29, 7:58 pm, Erkki Lindpere<[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok, I'll collect some specific issues I have with the API over a bit >> longer period of usage and post them as an issue in GitHub? Or here? >> >> Erkki L >> >> On Dec 28, 4:40 am, Naftoli Gugenheim<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> * there are several classes that have lots of methods in them that >>>> don't all belong together. For example: S, LiftRules, I'm sure there's >>>> more. Some packages have too many classes as well. I think there >>>> should be a cleaner separation of concerns. >> >>> Again, I think there is a willingness to do something about this but we need >>> your feedback. How would you categorize the concerns that S and LiftRules >>> address? How would you like to see that categorization reflected in the API? > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Lift" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en.
