That paper discusses it, but I don't think there was ever a paper proper on ZKCP. There are various discussions of it, though, if you google. Sadly this is common in this space - lots of great ideas where no one ever bothered to write academic-style papers about them (hence why academic papers around Bitcoin tend to miss nearly all relevant context, sadly).
Matt On 1/20/20 6:10 PM, Subhra Mazumdar wrote: > Are you referring to the paper Zero knowledge contingent payment > revisited ? I will look into the construction. Thanks for the > information! :) > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020, 23:31 Matt Corallo <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com > <mailto:lf-li...@mattcorallo.com>> wrote: > > On 11/9/19 4:31 AM, Takaya Imai wrote: > > [What I do not describe] > > * A way to detect that data is correct or not, namely zero knowledge > > proof process. > > Have you come across Zero Knowledge Contingent Payments? Originally it > was designed for on-chain applications but it slots neatly into > lightning as it only requires a method to lock funds to a hash preimage. > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > Lightning-dev mailing list > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > _______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
