But isn't it that the use of ZK proof will render the system slow and hence defy the very purpose of lightning network which intends to make things scalable as well as faster transaction ?
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:48 PM Matt Corallo <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com> wrote: > That paper discusses it, but I don't think there was ever a paper proper > on ZKCP. There are various discussions of it, though, if you google. > Sadly this is common in this space - lots of great ideas where no one > ever bothered to write academic-style papers about them (hence why > academic papers around Bitcoin tend to miss nearly all relevant context, > sadly). > > Matt > > On 1/20/20 6:10 PM, Subhra Mazumdar wrote: > > Are you referring to the paper Zero knowledge contingent payment > > revisited ? I will look into the construction. Thanks for the > > information! :) > > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020, 23:31 Matt Corallo <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com > > <mailto:lf-li...@mattcorallo.com>> wrote: > > > > On 11/9/19 4:31 AM, Takaya Imai wrote: > > > [What I do not describe] > > > * A way to detect that data is correct or not, namely zero > knowledge > > > proof process. > > > > Have you come across Zero Knowledge Contingent Payments? Originally > it > > was designed for on-chain applications but it slots neatly into > > lightning as it only requires a method to lock funds to a hash > preimage. > > > > Matt > > _______________________________________________ > > Lightning-dev mailing list > > Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > <mailto:Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev > > > -- Yours sincerely, Subhra Mazumdar.
_______________________________________________ Lightning-dev mailing list Lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lightning-dev
