>>> This could probably be
>>>
>>> \beaming {8[ 8] 8 8 8[ 8 8 8] }
>>>
>>> So we have another result of GLISS.
>>
>> Actually, I like David's original proposal better if the semantics
>> of the construction is to both typeset the particular music and to
>> use it as a template for a beaming rule.
>
> The disadvantage would be that you lose the option of using a more
> abstract specification like above, whether or not adorned with a
> placeholder pitch like c or not.
Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also.
Example:
\beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
+----+ +----+----+
+----+ +----+ -+
| | | | |
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
