Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: >>> Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also. >>> >>> Example: >>> >>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] } >>> >>> +----+ +----+----+ >>> +----+ +----+ -+ >>> | | | | | >>> >> >> First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work >> properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams >> currently nest in that manner. > > OK, ok :-) I'm just doing some brainstorming. I'm quite sure that > subbeaming with more than a single `[' has already been discussed a > longer time ago, but I can't remember the outcome.
I consider it likely that the partcombiner vetoed this change, judging from the tantrums it threw on the various iterations of the related slur problem <URL:http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2584>. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
