On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] }
>>>
>>> +----+ +----+----+
>>> +----+ +----+ -+
>>> | | | | |
>>>
>>
>> First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work
>> properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams
>> currently nest in that manner.
>
> OK, ok :-) I'm just doing some brainstorming. I'm quite sure that
> subbeaming with more than a single `[' has already been discussed a
> longer time ago, but I can't remember the outcome.
The original intent was for duplicate requests in most of these cases
to be ignored, so you could combine multiple identifiers into chords,
eg.
vOne = { c8[ d] }
vTwo = { e8[ f] }
forScore = \new Voice {
<< \vOne \vTwo >>
}
without this affecting the typesetting.
I would advise against overloading the meaning of existing constructs,
as it will have compatiblility implications.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [email protected] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
