Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes: >>>> This could probably be >>>> >>>> \beaming {8[ 8] 8 8 8[ 8 8 8] } >>>> >>>> So we have another result of GLISS. >>> >>> Actually, I like David's original proposal better if the semantics >>> of the construction is to both typeset the particular music and to >>> use it as a template for a beaming rule. >> >> The disadvantage would be that you lose the option of using a more >> abstract specification like above, whether or not adorned with a >> placeholder pitch like c or not. > > Yes. I would go even one step further, defining subbeams also. > > Example: > > \beaming 5/16 { 16[ 16] 16[[ 16] 16] } > > +----+ +----+----+ > +----+ +----+ -+ > | | | | | >
First we would need to get this manner of specifying subbeams work properly in manually beamed music. I don't think that manual beams currently nest in that manner. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
