On 2015/09/03 08:49:13, dak wrote:
On 2015/09/02 23:27:41, Dan Eble wrote:
> If the sorting criterion uses attributes of the Grob that are
changed by
> replacement, the array might not be sorted afterward (or might be
sorted when
it > wasn't before). Grob_array does not appear to dictate the sorting
criterion.
So the routine should reset the "sorted" flag when any changes are
made? Maybe; but it didn't before, and I don't want to deal with the consequences of changing the logic. With your consent, I'd like to move the ticket along to "countdown." https://codereview.appspot.com/264950043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
