On 2015/09/05 13:08:02, Dan Eble wrote:
On 2015/09/03 08:49:13, dak wrote: > On 2015/09/02 23:27:41, Dan Eble wrote: > > > If the sorting criterion uses attributes of the Grob that are
changed by
> > replacement, the array might not be sorted afterward (or might be
sorted
when > it > > wasn't before). Grob_array does not appear to dictate the sorting criterion. > > So the routine should reset the "sorted" flag when any changes are
made?
Maybe; but it didn't before, and I don't want to deal with the
consequences of
changing the logic. With your consent, I'd like to move the ticket
along to
"countdown."
Correction: I'd like your consent to push it. It was already listed in "Countdown" in James' email of Sep. 2, but the ticket was out of date. https://codereview.appspot.com/264950043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
