Robert Hickman <robehick...@gmail.com> writes: > Personally I prefer the syntax used by ABC notation, with all notes of > a slur inside the parans, but I don't see it being changed at this > point.
How does this work for consecutive slurs, like LilyPond's
{ c4( d)( e2) }
?
{ (c4 (d) e2) }
looks rather peculiar, wouldn't you say?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
