On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:20 AM, james <[email protected]> wrote:
[...] > here's an example > where the answer to my question was a bit above my level of understanding. > Granted, the question was a bit above my level of understanding… > I'm sorry, but I'm having a difficult time understanding your point. You asked a question about something which you confessed was beyond you, and I gave you a solution which works. Should I not have given you that solution because it contains some arcane gobbledygook? I was trying to be helpful. With that in mind, I adapted the solution so you wouldn't need to repeat buckets of code every time you wanted some other special text+dynamic combination: "rinforza p," "sempre p," etc. I thought that the example code made that sufficiently clear, and I apologize for not spelling that out better. Was my answer the best one? This depends on what version you're using, and even so, maybe not. In any case once a solution is up, others have something in front of them that they can improve. -David _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
