> Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: > >> So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have >> encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are >> `greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking >> for a non-Scheme solution isn't helpful either.
Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where I got the example which I have been using since at least 2.12, because centering such a new dynamic is probably rarer than having it left-aligned, I think it would be useful to note that there's an easy way of doing this. A minor change from the example in the documentation. \version "2.14.0" rinforzaF = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:normal-text "rinforza" #:dynamic "f")) tweekRinforzaF = \tweak DynamicText #'self-alignment-X #-1 #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:normal-text "rinforza" #:dynamic "f")) \relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\rinforzaF f f f f f f f } \relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\tweekRinforzaF f f f f f f f } I think the extension that happen to lilypond are a good thing, I have no problem with them. I don't have to understand all of them. I know that when these extensions happen, updating the documentation becomes an extremely arduous task. From a certain point of view, it's not really feasible to update everything in the documentation that's easier because of something that's changed in lilypond. I think, however, this would be a great place to make a change that certainly would have helped me. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user