> Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have
>> encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are
>> `greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking
>> for a non-Scheme solution isn't helpful either.
Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where I
got the example which I have been using since at least 2.12, because centering
such a new dynamic is probably rarer than having it left-aligned, I think it
would be useful to note that there's an easy way of doing this. A minor change
from the example in the documentation.
\version "2.14.0"
rinforzaF = #(make-dynamic-script
(markup #:normal-text "rinforza"
#:dynamic "f"))
tweekRinforzaF = \tweak DynamicText #'self-alignment-X #-1 #(make-dynamic-script
(markup #:normal-text "rinforza"
#:dynamic "f"))
\relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\rinforzaF f f f f f f f }
\relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\tweekRinforzaF f f f f f f f }
I think the extension that happen to lilypond are a good thing, I have no
problem with them. I don't have to understand all of them. I know that when
these extensions happen, updating the documentation becomes an extremely
arduous task. From a certain point of view, it's not really feasible to update
everything in the documentation that's easier because of something that's
changed in lilypond. I think, however, this would be a great place to make a
change that certainly would have helped me.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
