Hi Kieren, I thought of a change - or addition - like your proposal. At least the "counter" should be exchangable by the context-id. That way partcombined voices can be addressed by "up", "down" and so on. I can't say, if it is managable to omit the context-name (Voice or Staff or else). But we will see. So, yes, I consider it ;)
Best, Jan-Peter On 28.07.2014 03:38, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Jan-Peter, > >> > I think the most complicated part is addressing multiple voices in one >> > Staff. > […] >> > propably there are more things to modify to make it more intuitive. > I think the stated problem would be solved *AND* the whole machinery made > more intuitive by allowing a context to be “direct addressed”, i.e., the > context > > \new Staff = “MyStaff” \someMusic > > would be mod-ed using something like > > \editionMod ThisEdition 1 0/4 APiece.MyStaff \override … > > as opposed to > > \editionMod ThisEdition 1 0/4 APiece.Staff.B \override … > > It seems like a very small change — and might mess up your “templating” > system(s) — but three obvious and immediate benefits are: the ability to move > contexts within the score block without having to recode the edition; the > ability to change the type of context without recoding the edition; and the > ability to quickly cross-reference a mod with its context (i.e., no need to > “count” contexts). > > Consider it? > > Thanks, > Kieren.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
