Hi Jan-Peter, I continue to use your \editionEngraver to great effect. Thanks again! I really do think such a mechanism — properly tweaked/improved — should become a standard part of the Liypond distro.
A couple of questions: 1. Have you thought any more about allowing direct addressing of contexts? I’m currently revising a score with more than 10,000 frames (i.e., >200 measures on >50 staves), and would love to apply the \editionEngraver… but you can probably imagine my trepidation, given that any later context editing/reordering will break any existing edition tweaks. =\ 2. Have you thought any more about supporting anchor points in the score, so that one could say “the position/offset of this mod is relative to anchor point X”? When someone (Werner?) first suggested this, I didn’t immediately see the benefit — though I believe I ultimately agreed that as long as the anchor mechanism was independent of the existing \mark structure, it couldn’t hurt. Now that I’ve really used \editionEngraver a lot, and on a lot of big scores, I am convinced that an editionEngraver that Does The Right Thing™ absolutely must support such anchors. Again, I’m looking at adding or removing measures in this gargantuan score, and imagining the cascading chaos. Thanks! Kieren. On Jul 28, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Jan-Peter Voigt <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought of a change - or addition - like your proposal. At least the > "counter" should be exchangable by the context-id. > That way partcombined voices can be addressed by "up", "down" and so on. I > can't say, if it is managable to omit the context-name (Voice or Staff or > else). But we will see. > So, yes, I consider it ;) _______________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer www: <http://www.kierenmacmillan.info> email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
