Urs Liska wrote > That sounds reasonable. > However, original breaks *are* part of the content so that's not a > mixture.
Hi Urs, Well, I see where you're coming from, but I think we are understanding "content" differently here.[1] The original breaks are an important means to render the original version/presentation of the score, and you would probably want to include them in your file(s) so that version remained an option. But since the original layout is just one possible version/presentation among others, that tells me they are a matter of presentation and not content, in the way I'm understanding this distinction. Cheers, -Paul [1] See the following for the distinction between content and presentation that I have in mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_presentation_and_content -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/thanks-again-for-the-editionEngraver-tp164625p168116.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
