Oh, I went for a more copper based solution: http://www.swiftech.com/mc14bgamemoryramsinks.aspx
I expect they are overkill, but they fit nicely and have adhesive on them so fitting is trivial. They also look nice :-) Jameds On 22 January 2013 10:24, Dave Pigott <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Interesting discovery by Renato re overheating on Pandas - he had a similar > problem and just disabled wifi, and the board ran a *lot* cooler. Could this > be your problem in the toolchain pandas? > > Thanks > > Dave > > On 21 Jan 2013, at 19:53, Matthew Gretton-Dann > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 21/01/13 19:38, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm offline Tue/Wed, so here's update on CBuild/LAVA (other folks from >>> Infra should be present on Tue hangout). >>> >>> We've been doing integration testing since end of last week, and >>> generally it looks good. We didn't have complete end-to-end GCC build >>> due to PandaES + USB drive availability issues, but I tested gcc build >>> on Panda instead (this has some OOMs during "make check" in gcc), and >>> smaller builds like cortex-strings on PandaES. >> >> Some tests deliberately try to exhaust all memory - if they're not already >> we should be explicitly ulimiting the make check process to not cause random >> processes to be killed. >> >>> So, everything looks good for deployment on Thurs, just 2 following >>> issues are on critical path: >>> >>> 1. Patches >>> (https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+activereviews) >>> review by TCWG. Matt, I guess you were busy with toolchain release >>> last week, but we'd appreciate your review now. >> >> I'll try and do that in the next 48 hours. >> >>> 2. Merging the changes, assuming they're ok. Infra people don't have >>> commit access to CBuild repos, so we depend on TCWG here too. Actually, >>> it may be expected that after initial launch, we'll need to do more >>> changes and tweaks, so it may be good idea to give Infra (temporary) >>> commit access to streamline process. It would be nice to discuss this >>> during Tue hangout. >> >> I thought you had access, and was expecting you to merge all changes. I am >> happy for anyone to merge their own stuff when the merge has been approved. >> Can someone send me (off-list) the appropriate list of people (or Launchpad >> group) to give commit access to? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> >> -- >> Matthew Gretton-Dann >> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro >> >> _______________________________________________ >> linaro-validation mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation > -- James Tunnicliffe _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
