Hi Christophe,

It could be the wireless, or something else. Below is my blacklist on
modprobe.d:

# Rack mount no extra rubbish
blacklist rfcomm
blacklist bnep
blacklist bluetooth
blacklist ppdev
blacklist lp
blacklist parport
blacklist wl12xx_sdio
blacklist wl12xx
blacklist mac80211
blacklist twl6040_vibra
blacklist ff_memless
blacklist cfg80211

This involves wireless, bluetooth, parallel ports etc. It is also almost
all kernel modules active (with the exception of the led driver).

I also removed some silly packages and disabled most daemons, but I guess
your image is much cleaner than mine.

cheers,
--renato


On 22 January 2013 13:26, Christophe Lyon <[email protected]>wrote:

> It makes sense indeed (reminds me of my guru-plug getting very hot
> with wifi enabled).
>
> But currently ifconfig only shows eth0 and lo; it looks like wifi is
> not activated already :-(
>
> Christophe.
>
>
> On 22 January 2013 11:43, Matthew Gretton-Dann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interesting.  Christophe do you want to take a look?
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > On 22/01/13 10:24, Dave Pigott wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> Interesting discovery by Renato re overheating on Pandas - he had a
> >> similar problem and just disabled wifi, and the board ran a *lot*
> cooler.
> >> Could this be your problem in the toolchain pandas?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >> On 21 Jan 2013, at 19:53, Matthew Gretton-Dann
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 21/01/13 19:38, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm offline Tue/Wed, so here's update on CBuild/LAVA (other folks from
> >>>> Infra should be present on Tue hangout).
> >>>>
> >>>> We've been doing integration testing since end of last week, and
> >>>> generally it looks good. We didn't have complete end-to-end GCC build
> >>>> due to PandaES + USB drive availability issues, but I tested gcc build
> >>>> on Panda instead (this has some OOMs during "make check" in gcc), and
> >>>> smaller builds like cortex-strings on PandaES.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Some tests deliberately try to exhaust all memory - if they're not
> >>> already we should be explicitly ulimiting the make check process to not
> >>> cause random processes to be killed.
> >>>
> >>>> So, everything looks good for deployment on Thurs, just 2 following
> >>>> issues are on critical path:
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Patches
> >>>> (https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+activereviews)
> >>>> review by TCWG. Matt, I guess you were busy with toolchain release
> >>>> last week, but we'd appreciate your review now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I'll try and do that in the next 48 hours.
> >>>
> >>>> 2. Merging the changes, assuming they're ok. Infra people don't have
> >>>> commit access to CBuild repos, so we depend on TCWG here too.
> Actually,
> >>>> it may be expected that after initial launch, we'll need to do more
> >>>> changes and tweaks, so it may be good idea to give Infra (temporary)
> >>>> commit access to streamline process. It would be nice to discuss this
> >>>> during Tue hangout.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I thought you had access, and was expecting you to merge all changes.
>  I
> >>> am happy for anyone to merge their own stuff when the merge has been
> >>> approved.  Can someone send me (off-list) the appropriate list of
> people (or
> >>> Launchpad group) to give commit access to?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Matt
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matthew Gretton-Dann
> >>> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> linaro-validation mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthew Gretton-Dann
> > Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
>
_______________________________________________
linaro-validation mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation

Reply via email to