Hi all, I could run the gcc testsuite last night on tcpanda01: it took about 21h (!), but I still don't know how hot the board became :-(
Christophe. On 24 January 2013 10:48, Renato Golin Linaro <[email protected]> wrote: > I just had another lockup this night, given enough load, it will fail. :( > > cheers, > --renato > > > On 22 January 2013 16:18, Christophe Lyon <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> As discussed off-line with Renato, it seems there is no wifi on Panda >> (non-ES), and I didn't notice any useless daemons. >> >> Let's wait for the gcc build to complete with the thermal driver enabled. >> >> Christophe. >> >> >> On 22 January 2013 14:31, Renato Golin Linaro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Hi Christophe, >> > >> > It could be the wireless, or something else. Below is my blacklist on >> > modprobe.d: >> > >> > # Rack mount no extra rubbish >> > blacklist rfcomm >> > blacklist bnep >> > blacklist bluetooth >> > blacklist ppdev >> > blacklist lp >> > blacklist parport >> > blacklist wl12xx_sdio >> > blacklist wl12xx >> > blacklist mac80211 >> > blacklist twl6040_vibra >> > blacklist ff_memless >> > blacklist cfg80211 >> > >> > This involves wireless, bluetooth, parallel ports etc. It is also almost >> > all >> > kernel modules active (with the exception of the led driver). >> > >> > I also removed some silly packages and disabled most daemons, but I >> > guess >> > your image is much cleaner than mine. >> > >> > cheers, >> > --renato >> > >> > >> > On 22 January 2013 13:26, Christophe Lyon <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> It makes sense indeed (reminds me of my guru-plug getting very hot >> >> with wifi enabled). >> >> >> >> But currently ifconfig only shows eth0 and lo; it looks like wifi is >> >> not activated already :-( >> >> >> >> Christophe. >> >> >> >> >> >> On 22 January 2013 11:43, Matthew Gretton-Dann >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Interesting. Christophe do you want to take a look? >> >> > >> >> > Matt >> >> > >> >> > On 22/01/13 10:24, Dave Pigott wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> >> >> >> >> Interesting discovery by Renato re overheating on Pandas - he had a >> >> >> similar problem and just disabled wifi, and the board ran a *lot* >> >> >> cooler. >> >> >> Could this be your problem in the toolchain pandas? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> >> >> On 21 Jan 2013, at 19:53, Matthew Gretton-Dann >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 21/01/13 19:38, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Hello, >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> I'm offline Tue/Wed, so here's update on CBuild/LAVA (other folks >> >> >>>> from >> >> >>>> Infra should be present on Tue hangout). >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We've been doing integration testing since end of last week, and >> >> >>>> generally it looks good. We didn't have complete end-to-end GCC >> >> >>>> build >> >> >>>> due to PandaES + USB drive availability issues, but I tested gcc >> >> >>>> build >> >> >>>> on Panda instead (this has some OOMs during "make check" in gcc), >> >> >>>> and >> >> >>>> smaller builds like cortex-strings on PandaES. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Some tests deliberately try to exhaust all memory - if they're not >> >> >>> already we should be explicitly ulimiting the make check process to >> >> >>> not >> >> >>> cause random processes to be killed. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> So, everything looks good for deployment on Thurs, just 2 >> >> >>>> following >> >> >>>> issues are on critical path: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> 1. Patches >> >> >>>> (https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+activereviews) >> >> >>>> review by TCWG. Matt, I guess you were busy with toolchain release >> >> >>>> last week, but we'd appreciate your review now. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I'll try and do that in the next 48 hours. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> 2. Merging the changes, assuming they're ok. Infra people don't >> >> >>>> have >> >> >>>> commit access to CBuild repos, so we depend on TCWG here too. >> >> >>>> Actually, >> >> >>>> it may be expected that after initial launch, we'll need to do >> >> >>>> more >> >> >>>> changes and tweaks, so it may be good idea to give Infra >> >> >>>> (temporary) >> >> >>>> commit access to streamline process. It would be nice to discuss >> >> >>>> this >> >> >>>> during Tue hangout. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I thought you had access, and was expecting you to merge all >> >> >>> changes. >> >> >>> I >> >> >>> am happy for anyone to merge their own stuff when the merge has >> >> >>> been >> >> >>> approved. Can someone send me (off-list) the appropriate list of >> >> >>> people (or >> >> >>> Launchpad group) to give commit access to? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Thanks, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Matt >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Matthew Gretton-Dann >> >> >>> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> linaro-validation mailing list >> >> >>> [email protected] >> >> >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Matthew Gretton-Dann >> >> > Toolchain Working Group, Linaro >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
