It makes sense indeed (reminds me of my guru-plug getting very hot with wifi enabled).
But currently ifconfig only shows eth0 and lo; it looks like wifi is not activated already :-( Christophe. On 22 January 2013 11:43, Matthew Gretton-Dann <[email protected]> wrote: > Interesting. Christophe do you want to take a look? > > Matt > > On 22/01/13 10:24, Dave Pigott wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> Interesting discovery by Renato re overheating on Pandas - he had a >> similar problem and just disabled wifi, and the board ran a *lot* cooler. >> Could this be your problem in the toolchain pandas? >> >> Thanks >> >> Dave >> >> On 21 Jan 2013, at 19:53, Matthew Gretton-Dann >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 21/01/13 19:38, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm offline Tue/Wed, so here's update on CBuild/LAVA (other folks from >>>> Infra should be present on Tue hangout). >>>> >>>> We've been doing integration testing since end of last week, and >>>> generally it looks good. We didn't have complete end-to-end GCC build >>>> due to PandaES + USB drive availability issues, but I tested gcc build >>>> on Panda instead (this has some OOMs during "make check" in gcc), and >>>> smaller builds like cortex-strings on PandaES. >>> >>> >>> Some tests deliberately try to exhaust all memory - if they're not >>> already we should be explicitly ulimiting the make check process to not >>> cause random processes to be killed. >>> >>>> So, everything looks good for deployment on Thurs, just 2 following >>>> issues are on critical path: >>>> >>>> 1. Patches >>>> (https://code.launchpad.net/~linaro-infrastructure/+activereviews) >>>> review by TCWG. Matt, I guess you were busy with toolchain release >>>> last week, but we'd appreciate your review now. >>> >>> >>> I'll try and do that in the next 48 hours. >>> >>>> 2. Merging the changes, assuming they're ok. Infra people don't have >>>> commit access to CBuild repos, so we depend on TCWG here too. Actually, >>>> it may be expected that after initial launch, we'll need to do more >>>> changes and tweaks, so it may be good idea to give Infra (temporary) >>>> commit access to streamline process. It would be nice to discuss this >>>> during Tue hangout. >>> >>> >>> I thought you had access, and was expecting you to merge all changes. I >>> am happy for anyone to merge their own stuff when the merge has been >>> approved. Can someone send me (off-list) the appropriate list of people (or >>> Launchpad group) to give commit access to? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Matthew Gretton-Dann >>> Toolchain Working Group, Linaro >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> linaro-validation mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation >> >> > > > -- > Matthew Gretton-Dann > Toolchain Working Group, Linaro _______________________________________________ linaro-validation mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-validation
