----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Incidently, I did a little test comparing text, fields and an 'imaging lingo > font' where each character is described as a list and created on the fly. > Imaging was easily the fastest when the individual characters are > pre-rendered, and for smallish fonts was still faster even when creating > each character on the fly. See > http://www.lingoworkshop.com/testzone/stagetexttest.asp
Just out of interest, what method do you use to render your fonts? Do you grab them from text members, or use a proprietory font-rendering method? I'm just curious about how the "Lingoworkshop Pixel Fonts" differ from bitmap glyphs. - Robert [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
