I can understand that 16 lists and then 16 duped lists might be a lot - I
did something extremely similar - hell I might still have it online -using
beatnik. But I only had one list for all tracks. So it was one duped list.
I just wonder which is the worst overhead - 16 duped lists vs 16 timeout
objects. Or hell why not one timeout object that tells all tracks to
update?
And there'd really be no repeat loops - it'd merely be a comparison. Let's
say that one entry of your mixer channel would be something like [#time:
23004, #volume: 100, #pan:50]
Right? so then you'd just have something like
on enterframe me
if playbackmode then
if myVidChannel.movietime < dupedplaybackList[1].time then
-- set volume
-- set pan or whatever
dupedPlaybackList.deleteAt(1)
end if
end if
end enterframe me
[To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to
http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi To post messages to the list, email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Problems, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Lingo-L is for
learning and helping with programming Lingo. Thanks!]
