> On 31/01/2023 12:52 pm, David wrote: >> Human affairs need to be managed by humans, not machines.
On 31/1/23 5:45 pm, Jan Whitaker wrote: > Hmmm....I think it depends on the problem you're trying to solve. Humans > can't solve every problem in their heads, nor can they sometimes > determine what is actually true. I agree that relying on AI completely > isn't right either. That we are having this consideration just shows how > far we have come in AI. However, I would much rather AI or heavy duty > computing figure out a space mission than someone without. > > However, I reckon it's still better than those strange things they > relied on in Minority Report. Thoughts on the criteria to use in deciding which level of device autonomy is applicable to any particular situation are in: s.2.2 Drone Control (a) Autonomous Control [Drones specifically, 2014] http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/Drones-E.html#DCA s.4.1 Artefact Autonomy [AI generally, 2019] http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/AII.html#TAA in particular the para. just after the Table s.5.1 Complementary Artefact Intelligence http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/AII.html#CI 11. A Re-Conception of the Field [of AI and Robotics, 2023] http://www.rogerclarke.com/EC/AITS.html#RAI proposing the primary focus be on decision support, incl.: - Complementary Artefact Intelligence - Augmented Intelligence - Complementary Artefact Capability - Augmented Capability Critical consideration of the above much appreciated! -- Roger Clarke mailto:[email protected] T: +61 2 6288 6916 http://www.xamax.com.au http://www.rogerclarke.com Xamax Consultancy Pty Ltd 78 Sidaway St, Chapman ACT 2611 AUSTRALIA Visiting Professor in the Faculty of Law University of N.S.W. Visiting Professor in Computer Science Australian National University _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
