It's certain that most people don't suffer from EHS, and I'm among them. However some mainstream neurologists are concerned about the possible biological effects of EM radiation generally, which would reasonably suggest a normally distributed tail of hyper-sensitivity.
That's all.... David L. ------- On 2015-09-08 09:02 Tom Worthington wrote: > On 07/09/15 12:39, David Lochrin wrote: > > > ... Electromagnetic Hyper Sensitivity (EHS) ... Do any Linkers have > > thoughts on the subject? ... > > The web is a wonderful resource. A search for EHS returned, as the first > three hits: > > 1. Electromagnetic fields and public health, WHO: > http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs296/en/ > " ... there is no scientific basis to link EHS symptoms to EMF exposure > ..." > > 2. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, Wikipedia: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_hypersensitivity > "... no convincing scientific evidence for its being caused by > electromagnetic fields ..." > > 3. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity, Australian Radiation Protection and > Nuclear Safety Agency: > http://www.arpansa.gov.au/radiationprotection/Factsheets/is_ehs.cfm > "The scientific evidence does not establish that EHS symptoms are caused > by exposure to low-level electromagnetic fields." > > That is enough for me not to worry about EHS. > > ps: But I once tried to interpret my own chest X-ray using the Wikipedia > and decided I had TB. It turned out I had nothing wrong at all. ;-) > > > _______________________________________________ Link mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link
