On 8/09/2015 10:47 AM, David Lochrin wrote:
> It's certain that most people don't suffer from EHS, and I'm among them.  
> However some mainstream neurologists are concerned about the possible 
> biological effects of EM radiation generally, which would reasonably suggest 
> a normally distributed tail of hyper-sensitivity.
> ...
<https://theconversation.com/can-you-be-allergic-to-your-wi-fi-46935>

Anything is possible.
In view of:
- the remarkable range of non-specific symptoms attributed to the 
"syndrome";
- the lack of dose-response correlation and;
- repeated failures in blind provocation testing (symptoms reported in 
the absence of the supposed stimulus and absence of reported symptoms in 
its presence);
I rank the probability of EHS being substantiated as low.

For good or ill, the human mind is a powerful thing. It can keep us 
going when we'd normally stop or die. It can also make us ill, or even 
kill us.

Suppose I told someone that they had been cursed by a sorcerer. If they 
were susceptible, then they might worry themselves sick, attributing 
everyday aches and pains to the curse and imagining worse. They might 
even die.

I guess it beats burning witches or cutting up albinos to use their body 
parts in magic potions.

-- 
David Boxall                    |  The more that wise people learn
                                |  The more they come to appreciate
http://david.boxall.id.au       |  How much they don't know.
                                                         --Confucius

_______________________________________________
Link mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.anu.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/link

Reply via email to