On 10/08/2017 2:28 PM, Roger Clarke wrote:
Meanwhile, another one of those memes has re-emerged in the Cloud Cuckoo Land
that is contemporary US politics:
Maybe Americans don't need fast home Internet service, FCC suggests
Americans might not need a fast home Internet connection, the Federal
Communications Commission suggests in a new document. Instead, mobile Internet
via a smartphone might be all people need.
Oh God, they've dug up the Magic Wireless Fairy!
There are some brilliant comments:
Yeah, I look forward to downloading the next Windows update to four computers
over my cellular network. While all of my neighbors are trying to do the same.
I can't wait for the FCCs new "Make 56K Great Again" plan when we inevitably
lower our standards even further.
Hmm. So Comcast charges $10 for 50GB of data overages for their residential broadband plans. Verizon, meanwhile, charges $15 for a single GB of data overage on their mobile plans.
Gee, I wonder why this shill of the industry is pushing us to accept a service
that charges $15 per GB over the limit as opposed to one that charges $0.20 per
GB over the limit (a 7,500% increase by the way). Well, whatever the reason, it
must be best for the consumer.
There are still plenty in Australia who pretend that wireless can
substitute for optical fibre.
David Boxall | "Cheer up" they said.
| "Things could be worse."
http://david.boxall.id.au | So I cheered up and,
| Sure enough, things got worse.
| --Murphy's musing
Link mailing list