On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Jay Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 02:16:34PM -0500, David Boyes wrote: > > You'll have better luck blocking known dialup pools and known spammers > > using the DNS RBLs than just the people with no reverse DNS. There are > > several good freely available DNSRBLs out there that cut down the amount > > of spam substantially. > > I'm doing all that, and installing SpamAssassin as well. As I said, I'm > getting really aggressive about spam filtering. > > With all that said, it's still a bug that Marist has a system sending email > that doesn't have valid reverse DNS.
Which RFC is it violating? When I got my latest ADSL connection I insisted my IP address resolve; I didn't care a lot what it resolved too. However, I don't know it's mandatory. -- Cheers John. Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb
