On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 20:49, John Summerfield wrote: > > With all that said, it's still a bug that Marist has a system sending email > > that doesn't have valid reverse DNS. > > Which RFC is it violating?
It isnt violating any RFC > When I got my latest ADSL connection I insisted my IP address resolve; I > didn't care a lot what it resolved too. However, I don't know it's > mandatory. DNS itself is an add on to the internet. Also technically a mailer should only deliver mail _to_ a host with an MX record, but I wouldnt try enforcing that either 8)
