On Wednesday 04 December 2002 03:25 pm, you wrote:
> Dean,
>
> Interesting thoughts ...
>
> Basically IBM is a corporation with stockholders. A 'for profit'
> corporation. They will do things that they believe will earn them money.
> IBM is very interested in earning money (as are most if not all
> corporations). The key to this discussion is to come up with a way for IBM
> to earn money on a 'hobbyist' license. Something has to fund (pay for) the
> license and the IBM personal handling distribution/maintance/support of
> said license. License security (legal usage) is another issue (I will
> ignore that for now).
>
> Find a way for IBM to make a profit on a hobbyist license and they will do
> it. Remember IBM is a very large company. Their cost structure is much
> higher than you think. Suggesting a way for IBM to make $100,000 is not
> going to make it. $100K (or $1 million) is not even on any IBM managers
> radar screen.
>
> Does PWD make money? Probably not but the $13K/$20K everyone complains
> about probably does not even cover the cost of IBM running the project.
> Remember, NO AD/CDs any more and PWD costs have largely been moved to
> T3/Cornerstone as distributors. Most PWD personal are now doing something
> else. IBM has lowered their costs by moving the PWD program outside IBM but
> T3/Cornerstone have to make money too.

So why all this hoohaa about IBM being risk-averse to the hobbyist license 
idea?  If IBM isn't making any money on their current Big Iron on PC setup, 
set as it is at such a low rate - for Big Iron that is.  

The reason I see - and others will back me up - for a hobbyist license is to 
interest those hackers and hobbyists who find the concept of BIG IRON 
inherently interesting, in the IBM mainframe.

Harry Singh in "UNIX for MVS Programmers" makes the point that Unix and "Open 
Systems" got so big because they were more economic than the Big Iron, once 
you factored in all the people coming out of training with Unix skills and 
knowledge.

Once you factor in that Big Iron is superior to Distributed Systems for heavy 
batch work, then IBM's refusal to open a hobbyist license seems absurd.  If 
the reason why Big Iron went downhill so fast was most of the non-batch stuff 
was cheaper with "Open Systems" and uni-trained staff, then for the 
shareholders' sakes, you'd expect they'd tolerate a little "ablation" around 
the edges to keep the Big Iron business healthy.

If it means they'd have at least 10-20% more trained (self-trained) Big Iron 
programmers, sys-admins, whathaveyou, it should be a workable business 
proposition - well, apparently the DB/2 people think so.  Check out the DB/2 
web sites - the free personal use download ones are the ones I'm thinking of 
- and yes, they apparently got the head honchos to see it their way.  it's in 
competition with Oracle, and Oracle is in competition with Microsoft, which 
doesn't give their SQLServer away - just expects that we the customers will 
follow "For we like sheep ..."

Until IBM adds all its batch-processing stuff to Linux and makes it the 
batch-processing successor to MVS etc, they're still going to be trying to 
sell Big Iron for MVS et al., and with the current rate of natural attrition 
of Big Iron programmers, they're going to find it harder and harder.

>
> Complain if you want but the reality is if you want a hobbyist license you
> have to find a way for IBM to make money on it. Heck, you might get them to
> at least listen to you if you could find a way for them to break-even on
> the license (but I doubt it).

Heinlein in The Space Family Stone has them selling all sorts of goodies to 
asteroid miners, on the basis that the miners in a gold rush never made any 
money - only the shop keepers that followed them  And there's always that 
saying about selling the sizzle, not the steak.  I suppose it's true.

We're asking IBM to consider the sizzle of 10-20% more programmers, etc, for 
Big Iron, as against the steak of $13,000 for people in business with a 
written-down business plan, etc, which they can also run in parallel - but of 
course, keeping them quite separate.  If you want to train yourself in Big 
Iron, you go for the hobbyist license - if you want to start a business, you 
go for the $13,000 license with IBM's blessings!  Of course, once you have 
your 10-20% more trained programmers, you have that many more people who can 
cobble together a believable business plan based on their knowledge of Big 
Iron.

Wesley Parish

>
> Regards,
> Jeff

-- 
Mau e ki, "He aha te mea nui?"
You ask, "What is the most important thing?"
Maku e ki, "He tangata, he tangata, he tangata."
I reply, "It is people, it is people, it is people."

Reply via email to