I guess Microslop has learned their lesson. It use to be, Windows (Windows 3.x) wasn't done until 123 is broke.
Now it is Windows isn't done until Linux is broke. Microslop has never played well with others. The people working on Samba will come up with the changes to allow it to work with 2003 AD, and then Microslop will change it with a "service pack" to keep Samba at bay (at least they will tout that it doesn't work). Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/11 2:14 PM >>> On Mer, 2003-06-11 at 18:20, Lionel Dyck wrote: > We are doing a TCO (with Microsoft - please don't laugh - crying is > allowed) and they are being very adament that Samba 2.2 can not play with > a Windows 2003 Active Directory environment. I found some info that > indicated that Samba 2.2 can play with a Windows 2000 AD but MS is > claiming that Windows 2003 AD is different. > > Can anyone shed any light on this that would help rebut the MS claims? If its not true I'm sure Microsoft will make sure its true in the next release of their software. Its more important to ask "why is this problem occurring, who caused it and how do we stop it happening again"
