> One more point about netsnmp, beyond the HOST, MIB-II, and UCD > mibs provided by netsnmp, we've extended it to support a set > of (growing) velocity software mibs that we have found necessary > to meet the challenge of mainframe style capacity planning and > performance analysis requirements....
It sounds like you've identified a number of areas where the SMI doesn't really do the job. The periodic review for the SMI MIBs is coming up in the next few months. Do you have plans to submit these extensions to the IETF as possible inclusions in the standard? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
