We used LVM for all filesystems except the root FS. Since the volume group "virtualization" is activated by the SYSVINIT scripts, /boot, /lib, /bin and /etc have to be on "native" disk.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Eli > Criffield > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [LINUX-390] LVM for system fs in production? > > > Is anyone using lvm for all there file systems safely. We currently > only use lvm for non-system file systems only, but have a test box > that uses lvm for every file system except /boot. > > The test box is working fine but i just wanted to check to see if > there is any reason to not use lvm for system file systems (/usr, > /var, /ect...) before i made a production box all lvm. > > > Also the same question about reiserfs? Does anyone use reiserfs? Is > there any reason not to use reiserfs? > > Eli > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO > LINUX-390 or visit > http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390 > -------------------------------------------------------- If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose, copy, retain or redistribute it. Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail. http://www.ml.com/email_terms/ -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
