Hello,
We'll finally choose between: 1) Two servers (active-active) accessing shared disks with OCFS2. This file system it's recent, and we aren't sure if it's production ready, to store 2 TB of files. 2) Two servers (active-active) accessing an active-passive NFS cluster, with EVMS and XFS(better for a lot of large files, but don't sure if it's better than ext3 now). NFS it's a point of fail, and we need two more virtual machines. (Another option is two servers active-passive accessing directly to disk - EVMS and XFS). For high availability options, I consider the mentioned in "High Availability Architectures For Linux on IBM System z", open-source packages (linux virtual server,...) with no outage-time (ugh!, we'll have to test it), or the Tivoli System Automation product (with $$$ and the intrinsic complexity in Tivoli distributed products). Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
