-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Boyes wrote:
> and maybe > get rid of RPM too...8-) (The Nexenta guys did a super job with adapting APT > to Solaris.) I consistently see this complaint, and it really rubs me wrong. Why does everyone compare rpm to apt? Wouldn't rpm to deb be the correct comparison, and then compare yum to apt? If you want to ask why the floop it took as long as it did for redhat to adopt yum, that's valid, or if you want to compare yum and apt, that's valid, or comparing deb to rpm, okay; but comparing rpm to apt just doesn't fly. - -- Pat -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknK9ikACgkQNObCqA8uBswhyACfQDsvXsMaymvJj1rzBb5+BLID RnIAnRQFb84FkUWjqH142fRLl+HPliuv =dDGe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
