Patrick Spinler wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
David Boyes wrote:
and maybe
get rid of RPM too...8-) (The Nexenta guys did a super job with adapting APT
to Solaris.)
I consistently see this complaint, and it really rubs me wrong. Why
does everyone compare rpm to apt? Wouldn't rpm to deb be the correct
comparison, and then compare yum to apt?
More accurately, rpm to dpkg. I don't think the package format is that
important, though there might be room for discussion about the metadata
stored therein.
I haven't yet figured out what's wrong with up2date.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[email protected] [email protected]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
