On Thursday 14 May 2009 11:01, Hall, Ken (GTS) wrote:
>Most of the "stateless" implementations I've seen seem to rely on "bind
>mounts", but that seems to be a bit of a hack. "Union" mounting, such
>as "Unionfs" look like it would be a cleaner approach, but I can't find
>out if there's a workable implementation of that. Any ideas?
>
>I've pulled the unionfs patch, but I'm reluctant to go to the trouble of
>maintaining yet another custom kernel module.
That's the same reason I'm not using unionfs, although I'd very much like to.
It would make a lot of the stuff I do with shared DASD *much* easier.
Mark, do you know if Novell plans to make unionfs (or anything like it)
available in SLES anytime soon? Can we nudge them in that direction?
- MacK.
-----
Edmund R. MacKenty
Software Architect
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street · Newton, MA 02466-2272 · USA
Tel: +1.617.614.4321
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
