> A ROT for performance:
> 1 layer of emulation loses 90%.
> Bear in mind you're using two layers of emulation. I suggest DOS/Win 3.1
> for your first effort, or WI9{5,8}.
>
> I'm sure it will work, and you might like to get some screen shots first
> time.There are reasons that I refer to these kinds of efforts as enemalation. In all seriousness, I seem to recall that Windows "does not play well with others" when it comes to letting a system lay idle when there is no work necessary though I may be a bit out-of-date. (Heck, the 100Hz timer pop made Linux seem fiendly rather than friendly!) I wonder if anyone has gotten OS|2 up on top of Bochs. What about the intel version of MacOS X? What of the SIMH suite? Maybe bringing up an ancient system (TSS-8, perhaps?) would be more entertaining... - soup -- John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines souperb at gmail dot com MacOS X proved it was easier to make Unix user-friendly than to fix Windows ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
