RE: NanoX version 0.3 released

[Greg Haerr]

It's all about finding time to re-write code that's already written in the bios, and
space tradeoffs in the 64k codeseg limit for the kernel...  Not to mention
portability issues.

On Wednesday, May 12, 1999 7:27 AM, Ansel [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >easily handle.  Personally I'm of the opinion that using the BIOS for
> >everything possible is a great shortcut.  Lots of device drivers talk to
> Shouldn't ELKS ultimately be able to run on systems without a BIOS?
> 
> -Ansel the Lurker.
>